Judicial Review Handbook, The Hon Sir Michael Fordham

Автор: Davis
Название: Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
ISBN: 1107053617 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781107053618
Издательство: Cambridge Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 116160.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Does the judiciary lack the necessary expertise, or is it a vital safeguard for the principle of constitutionalism? In this book, leading experts explore this debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia.

Автор: Piers von Berg
Название: Criminal Judicial Review: A Practitioner`s Guide to Judicial Review in the Criminal Justice System and Related Areas
ISBN: 1849465371 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781849465373
Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic
Рейтинг:
Цена: 105600.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Written by a team of criminal and public law practitioners, this is a comprehensive guide to challenging decisions of criminal courts and public bodies in the criminal justice system using judicial review.

Автор: Davis
Название: Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
ISBN: 1107662966 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781107662964
Издательство: Cambridge Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 40130.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Does the judiciary lack the necessary expertise, or is it a vital safeguard for the principle of constitutionalism? In this book, leading experts explore this debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia.

Автор: Janina Boughey
Название: Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada: The Newest Despotism?
ISBN: 1509907866 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509907861
Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic
Рейтинг:
Цена: 126720.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: It is commonly asserted that bills of rights have had a 'righting' effect on the principles of judicial review of administrative action and been a key driver of the modern expansion in judicial oversight of the executive arm of government. A number of commentators have pointed to Australian administrative law as evidence for this 'righting' hypothesis. They have suggested that the fact that Australia is an outlier amongst common law jurisdictions, in having neither a statutory nor a constitutional framework to expressly protect human rights, explaining why Australia alone continues to take an apparently 'formalist, ' 'legalist' and 'conservative' approach to administrative law. Other commentators and judges, including a number in Canada, have argued the opposite: that bills of rights have the effect of stifling the development of the common law. However, for the most part, all of these claims remain just that as there has been limited detailed analysis of the issue, and no detailed comparative analysis of the claims' veracity. This book analyzes in detail administrative and human rights law in Australia and Canada, arguing that both jurisdictions have reached remarkably similar positions regarding the balance between judicial and executive power, and between broader fundamental principles, including the rule of law and the separation of powers. It will provide valuable reading for all those researching judicial review and human rights. Revised Dissertation. (Series: Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law, Vol. 16) Subject: Public Law, Human Rights Law, Comparative Law, Administrative Law

Автор: Rachel E. Bowen
Название: The Achilles Heel of Democracy
ISBN: 1107178320 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781107178328
Издательство: Cambridge Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 105590.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Comparing five Central American countries, this book explores the influences of criminals, activists, and other societal actors on the justice system. The role of the judiciary in promoting the rule of law is of interest to political science and legal scholars. This work with its focus on Central America will be of particular interest.

Автор: Gerhard van der Schyff
Название: Judicial Review of Legislation
ISBN: 9400723997 ISBN-13(EAN): 9789400723993
Издательство: Springer
Рейтинг:
Цена: 65210.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: This book compares the judicial review of legislation in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the South African constitution of 1996, probing the justification and scope of review, to reveal the influences and practical matters of design and scope.

Автор: Sarah Nason
Название: Reconstructing Judicial Review
ISBN: 150990462X ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509904624
Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic
Рейтинг:
Цена: 95040.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: This book offers a new interpretation of judicial review in England and Wales as being concerned with the advancement of justice and good governance, as opposed to being concerned primarily with ultra vires or common law constitutionalism. It is developed both from examining the functions and values that ought to be served by judicial review, and from analysis of empirical 'social' facts about judicial review primarily as experienced in the Administrative Court. Based on ground-up case law analysis it constructs a new taxonomy on the grounds of judicial review: mistake, procedural impropriety, ordinary common law statutory interpretation, discretionary impropriety, relevant/irrelevant considerations, breach of an ECHR protected right orequality duty, and constitutional allocation of powers, constitutional rights, or other complex constitution principles. It explains each of these grounds, what academic and judicial support there might be for them outside case law analysis, and their similarities and differences when viewed against popular existing taxonomies. It concludes that Administrative Court judges are engaged in ordinary common law statutory interpretation in approximately half of all cases, and that where discretionary judgement is involved on the part of the initial decision-maker, judges do indeed consider their task to be one of determining whether the challenged decision was justified by reasoning of adequate quality. It finds that judges apply ordinary common law principles of statutory interpretation with historical pedigrees, including assessing the initial decision-maker's reasoning with reference to statutory purpose, and sifting relevant from irrelevant considerations, including moral considerations. The result is a ground-breaking reassessment of the grounds of judicial review in England and Wales and the practice of the Administrative Court. Subject: Public Law, Legal Philsophy, Socio-Legal Studies]