Reconstructing Judicial Review 9781509904624

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 81280T
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: 77 шт.
При оформлении заказа до: 24 фев 2025
Ориентировочная дата поставки: Март
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Sarah Nason
Название: Reconstructing Judicial Review
Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic
Классификация:

Судебные полномочия

ISBN: 150990462X
ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509904624
Обложка/Формат: Hardback
Страницы: 256
Вес: 0.528 кг.
Дата издания: 01.12.2016
Серия: Law & Criminology
Язык: English
Иллюстрации: Illustrations
Размер: 165 x 262 x 22
Читательская аудитория: Tertiary education (us: college)
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: This book offers a new interpretation of judicial review in England and Wales as being concerned with the advancement of justice and good governance, as opposed to being concerned primarily with ultra vires or common law constitutionalism. It is developed both from examining the functions and values that ought to be served by judicial review, and from analysis of empirical social facts about judicial review primarily as experienced in the Administrative Court. Based on ground-up case law analysis it constructs a new taxonomy on the grounds of judicial review: mistake, procedural impropriety, ordinary common law statutory interpretation, discretionary impropriety, relevant/irrelevant considerations, breach of an ECHR protected right orequality duty, and constitutional allocation of powers, constitutional rights, or other complex constitution principles. It explains each of these grounds, what academic and judicial support there might be for them outside case law analysis, and their similarities and differences when viewed against popular existing taxonomies. It concludes that Administrative Court judges are engaged in ordinary common law statutory interpretation in approximately half of all cases, and that where discretionary judgement is involved on the part of the initial decision-maker, judges do indeed consider their task to be one of determining whether the challenged decision was justified by reasoning of adequate quality. It finds that judges apply ordinary common law principles of statutory interpretation with historical pedigrees, including assessing the initial decision-makers reasoning with reference to statutory purpose, and sifting relevant from irrelevant considerations, including moral considerations. The result is a ground-breaking reassessment of the grounds of judicial review in England and Wales and the practice of the Administrative Court. Subject: Public Law, Legal Philsophy, Socio-Legal Studies]
Дополнительное описание: 1. Introduction: Reconstructing Judicial Review 2. The Dual Nature of Law and the Methodology of this Study: Constructive Interpretation 3. Judicial Review and Values 4. An Operative Interpretation of Judicial Review: Social Practice and the Adminis

Reconstructing Judicial Review, Sarah Nason