The American Review; To Stand By The Constitution August 1852, Hooker Colton George, Davenport Whelpley James
Автор: Hale Название: Patronal Politics ISBN: 1107423139 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781107423138 Издательство: Cambridge Academ Рейтинг: Цена: 28090.00 T Наличие на складе: Есть Описание: This book proposes a new way of understanding events throughout the world that are usually interpreted as democratization, rising authoritarianism, or revolution. Where the rule of law is weak and corruption pervasive, what may appear to be democratic or authoritarian breakthroughs are often just regular, predictable phases in longer-term cyclic dynamics - patronal politics.
Автор: Victor Ferreres Comella Название: The Constitution of Spain: A Contextual Analysis ISBN: 1849460167 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781849460163 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 28500.00 T Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ. Описание: This book provides a critical introduction to the principles and institutions that make up the Spanish Constitution, which was enacted in 1978.
Автор: Story Joseph Название: Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States Vol. II (in three volumes): with a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colon ISBN: 1646792165 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781646792160 Издательство: Неизвестно Рейтинг: Цена: 39300.00 T Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ. Описание: Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States Vol. II-with a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States Before the Adoption of the Constitution, written by Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story in three volumes, was first published in 1833, of which this edition is a replica.
Автор: Whittington Keith E. Название: Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present ISBN: 0700627790 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780700627790 Издательство: Mare Nostrum (Eurospan) Рейтинг: Цена: 50150.00 T Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ. Описание: When the Supreme Court strikes down favored legislation, politicians cry judicial activism. When the law is one politicians oppose, the court is heroically righting a wrong. In our polarized moment of partisan fervor, the Supreme Court's routine work of judicial review is increasingly viewed through a political lens, decried by one side or the other as judicial overreach, or “legislating from the bench.” But is this really the case? Keith E. Whittington asks in Repugnant Laws , a first-of-its-kind history of judicial review. A thorough examination of the record of judicial review requires first a comprehensive inventory of relevant cases. To this end, Whittington revises the extant catalog of cases in which the court has struck down a federal statute and adds to this, for the first time, a complete catalog of cases upholding laws of Congress against constitutional challenges. With reference to this inventory, Whittington is then able to offer a reassessment of the prevalence of judicial review, an account of how the power of judicial review has evolved over time, and a persuasive challenge to the idea of an antidemocratic, heroic court. In this analysis, it becomes apparent that that the court is political and often partisan, operating as a political ally to dominant political coalitions; vulnerable and largely unable to sustain consistent opposition to the policy priorities of empowered political majorities; and quasi-independent, actively exercising the power of judicial review to pursue the justices' own priorities within bounds of what is politically tolerable. The court, Repugnant Laws suggests, is a political institution operating in a political environment to advance controversial principles, often with the aid of political leaders who sometimes encourage and generally tolerate the judicial nullification of federal laws because it serves their own interests to do so. In the midst of heated battles over partisan and activist Supreme Court justices, Keith Whittington's work reminds us that, for better or for worse, the court reflects the politics of its time.
