Atikcan, Ece Ozlem Nadeau, Richard Belanger, Eric Framing risky choices 9780228000808

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 31730.00T
Кол-во:
о цене
Наличие: Невозможна поставка.

в Мои желания

Автор: Atikcan, Ece Ozlem Nadeau, Richard Belanger, Eric
Название: Framing risky choices
ISBN: 9780228000808
Издательство: Mare Nostrum (Eurospan)
Классификация:

Исследования средств массовой информации

Политика и политический строй

ISBN-10: 0228000807
Обложка/Формат: Paperback
Страницы: 248
Вес: 0.39 кг.
Дата издания: 03.06.2020
Язык: English
Иллюстрации: 22 photos, 20 diagrams, 40 tables
Размер: 153 x 228 x 21
Подзаголовок: Brexit and the dynamics of high-stakes referendums
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: The majority of policymakers, academics, and members of the general public expected British citizens to vote to remain in the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This perception was based on the well-established idea that voters dont like change or uncertainty. So why did the British public vote to take such a major economic risk? Framing Risky Choices addresses this question by placing the Brexit vote in the bigger picture of EU and Scottish independence referendums. Drawing from extensive interviews and survey data, it asserts that the framing effect – mobilizing voters by encouraging them to think along particular lines – matters, but not every argument is equally effective. Simple, evocative, and emotionally compelling frames that offer negativity are especially effective in changing peoples minds. In the Brexit case, the Leave side neutralized the economic risks of Brexit and proposed other risks relating to remaining in the EU, such as losing control of immigration policy and a lack of funding for the National Health Service. These concrete, impassioned arguments struck an immediate and familiar chord with voters. Most intriguingly, the Remain side was silent on these issues, without an emotional case to present. Framing Risky Choices presents a multi-method, comparative, state-of-the-art analysis of how the Brexit campaign contributed to the outcome. Uncovering the core mechanism behind post-truth politics, it shows that the strength of an argument is not its empirical validity but its public appeal.
Дополнительное описание: Media studies|Politics and government|Political science and theory|Communication studies|Elections and referenda / suffrage

Framing risky choices, Atikcan, Ece Ozlem Nadeau, Richard Belanger, Eric