The Paul-Apollos Relationship and Paul`s Stance toward Greco-Roman Rhetoric: An Exegetical and Socio-historical Study of 1 Corinthians 1-4 9780567689702

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 35890.00T
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: 192 шт.
При оформлении заказа до:
Ориентировочная дата поставки:
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Corin Mihaila
Название: The Paul-Apollos Relationship and Paul`s Stance toward Greco-Roman Rhetoric: An Exegetical and Socio-historical Study of 1 Corinthians 1-4
ISBN: 9780567689702
Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic
Классификация:

Библиология и экзегетика

ISBN-10: 0567689700
Обложка/Формат: Paperback
Страницы: 272
Вес: 0.39 кг.
Дата издания: 25.07.2019
Серия: The library of new testament studies
Язык: English
Размер: 156 x 235 x 17
Читательская аудитория: Tertiary education (us: college)
Ключевые слова: Biblical studies & exegesis, RELIGION / Biblical Studies / Paul's Letters
Подзаголовок: An exegetical and socio-historical study of 1 corinthians 1-4
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: Research into the social and rhetorical background of the Corinthian church, shows that the Corinthians were evaluating their leaders based on their rhetorical prowess, seeking to associate with those who would enhance their status and honour. The coherence of Pauls argument in 1 Corinthians 1-4 is evaluated, particularly by showing how Pauls discourse of the cross and Sophia relate to the issue of the dissensions in the Corinthian ekklesia. Once demonstrated that there is a misunderstanding of wisdom amongst church leaders at the basis of the dissensions, a redefinition of the wisdom offered in Corinthians is required.

In what could be considered the locus of Pauls theology of proclamation (i.e., 1 Corinthians 2:1-5), he rejects any employment of worldly wisdom in his proclamation of the cross for theological reasons and will not allow himself or other leaders to be drawn into this game of personality cult and honour enhancement.

Such conclusions then raise the question of the role played by Apollos name in Pauls argument against dissensions. After a review of several possible views, it is concluded-based primarily on exegetical grounds and refusing to engage in hermeneutical speculations-that Paul had a congenial relationship with Apollos. If any distinction is drawn between the two, it was solely the Corinthians fault, who viewed their preachers in competitive rather than complementary terms.

The Paul-Apollos Relationship and Paul`s Stance toward Greco-Roman Rhetoric: An Exegetical and Socio-historical Study of 1 Corinthians 1-4, Corin Mihaila