Guretzki Karl Barth on the Filioque 9781138262072

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 58170.00T
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: 178 шт.
При оформлении заказа до: 2025-08-18
Ориентировочная дата поставки: конец Сентября - начало Октября
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Guretzki
Название: Karl Barth on the Filioque
ISBN: 9781138262072
Издательство: Taylor&Francis
Классификация:

Философия религии

Христианство

Христианская теология

ISBN-10: 1138262072
Обложка/Формат: Paperback
Страницы: 226
Вес: 0.42 кг.
Дата издания: 15.11.2016
Серия: Barth studies
Язык: English
Размер: 235 x 156 x 22
Читательская аудитория: General (us: trade)
Ключевые слова: Philosophy of religion, RELIGION / General
Основная тема: Religion and Philosophy
Ссылка на Издательство: Link
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Европейский союз
Описание: Despite the burgeoning literature on Karl Barth, his doctrine of the Holy Spirit continues to be under-appreciated by his friends and critics alike. Yet, while Barths commitment to the doctrine of the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son (Filioque) is well-known, many scholars dismiss his stand as ecumenically untenable and few have bothered to subject his stance on the Filioque to close theological analysis. For those interested in this long-standing ecumenical point of contention between Eastern and Western trinitarian theology, this book will show how Barths doctrine of the Filioque may still have something to contribute to the debate. The work traces the origin of Barths commitment to the Filioque in his early career (particularly in Romans and the GA¶ttingen Dogmatics), and then analyzes how the doctrine functions throughout the Church Dogmatics. Guretzki concludes that Barths doctrine of the Filioque, while clearly standing within the Western trinitarian tradition, is atypical in that he refuses to speak of a double-procession in favour of a common procession of the Spirit”a position that has more affinity with the Eastern position than many of Barths critics may have thought

Karl Barth on the Filioque, Guretzki