Zamir, Eyal. Law, economics, and morality / 9780195372168

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 90810.00T
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: 162 шт.
При оформлении заказа до: 2025-08-04
Ориентировочная дата поставки: Август-начало Сентября
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Zamir, Eyal.
Название: Law, economics, and morality /
Перевод названия: Эйял Замир: Право, экономика и мораль
ISBN: 9780195372168
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Классификация:

Этика и философия нравов

Экономика

Международное право в области прав человека

ISBN-10: 0195372166
Обложка/Формат: Hardcover
Страницы: 376
Вес: 0.66 кг.
Дата издания: 08.04.2010
Язык: English
Иллюстрации: Black & white illustrations
Размер: 236 x 164 x 26
Читательская аудитория: Professional & vocational
Ссылка на Издательство: Link
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: Law, Economics, and Morality examines the possibility of combining economic methodology and deontological morality through explicit and direct incorporation of moral constraints into economic models. Economic analysis of law is a powerful analytical methodology. However, as a purely
consequentialist approach, which determines the desirability of acts and rules solely by assessing the goodness of their outcomes, standard cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is normatively objectionable. Moderate deontology prioritizes such values as autonomy, basic liberties, truth-telling, and
promise-keeping over the promotion of good outcomes. It holds that there are constraints on promoting the good. Such constraints may be overridden only if enough good (or bad) is at stake. While moderate deontology conforms to prevailing moral intuitions and legal doctrines, it is arguably lacking
in methodological rigor and precision.

Eyal Zamir and Barak Medina argue that the normative flaws of economic analysis can be rectified without relinquishing its methodological advantages and that moral constraints can be formalized so as to make their analysis more rigorous. They discuss various substantive and methodological choices
involved in modeling deontological constraints. Zamir and Medina propose to determine the permissibility of any act or rule infringing a deontological constraint by means of mathematical threshold functions. Law, Economics, and Morality presents the general structure of threshold functions, analyzes
their elements and addresses possible objections to this proposal. It then illustrates the implementation of constrained CBA in several legal fields, including contract law, freedom of speech, antidiscrimination law, the fight against terrorism, and legal paternalism.

Law, economics, and morality /, Zamir, Eyal.