The Constructive Mind, Wagoner

Автор: Johnson
Название: Constructive Controversy
ISBN: 1107461502 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781107461505
Издательство: Cambridge Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 35910.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Using the social psychological theory of `constructive controversy`, this book analyses the nature of disagreement among members of decision-making groups. It addresses questions such as: do differences of opinion enhance or obstruct creative thinking? And why do people make decisions based only on their own perspective without considering alternative viewpoints?

Автор: Schmalhofer
Название: Constructive Knowledge Acquisition
ISBN: 113887664X ISBN-13(EAN): 9781138876644
Издательство: Taylor&Francis
Рейтинг:
Цена: 47970.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: This volume, which describes the development and experimental testing of a model of how knowledge is acquired (using LISP programming as the domain of interest), will be of value to all cognitive scientists, AI researchers, and cognitive psychologists.

Автор: Douglas
Название: Constructive Drinking
ISBN: 0415606705 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780415606707
Издательство: Taylor&Francis
Рейтинг:
Цена: 57150.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: First published in 1987, Constructive Drinking studies the functions drinking plays within society. A series of original case studies deal with a variety of exotic - not just alcohol - from a variety of cultural and geographical contexts.

Автор: Johnson
Название: Constructive Controversy
ISBN: 1107089816 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781107089815
Издательство: Cambridge Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 61250.00 T
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Using the social psychological theory of `constructive controversy`, this book analyses the nature of disagreement among members of decision-making groups. It addresses questions such as: do differences of opinion enhance or obstruct creative thinking? And why do people make decisions based only on their own perspective without considering alternative viewpoints?