Ethical Judgments: Re-Writing Medical Law 9781849465793

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 52790.00T
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Англия: 1 шт. Склад Америка: 200 шт.
При оформлении заказа до:
Ориентировочная дата поставки:

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Stephen W Smith, John Coggon, Clark Hobson, Richar
Название: Ethical Judgments: Re-Writing Medical Law
ISBN: 9781849465793
Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic
Классификация:

Медицинское право и законодательство о медицинском обслуживании

Медицинская этика и профессиональная нормы поведения

ISBN-10: 1849465797
Обложка/Формат: Paperback
Страницы: 312
Вес: 0.50 кг.
Дата издания: 12.01.2017
Серия: Law & Criminology
Язык: English
Размер: 158 x 235 x 24
Читательская аудитория: Professional and scholarly
Ключевые слова: Medical & healthcare law, LAW / Medical Law & Legislation
Основная тема: Medical & healthcare law,LAW / Medical Law & Legislation
Подзаголовок: Re-writing medical law
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: This edited collection is designed to explore the ethical nature of judicial decision-making, particularly relating to cases in the health/medical sphere, where judges are often called upon to issue rulings on questions containing an explicit ethical component. However, judges do not receive any specific training in ethical decision-making, and often disown any place for ethics in their decision-making. Consequently, decisions made by judges do not present consistent or robust ethical theory, even when cases appear to rely on moral claims. The project explores this dichotomy by imagining a world in which decisions by judges have to be ethically as well as legally valid. Nine specific cases are reinterpreted in light of that requirement by leading academics in the fields of medical law and bioethics. Two judgments are written in each case, allowing for different views to be presented. Two commentaries - one ethical and one legal - then explore the ramifications of the ethical judgments and provide an opportunity to explore the two judgments from additional ethical and legal perspectives. These four different approaches to each judgment allow for a rich and varied critique of the decisions and ethical theories and issues at play in each case.
Дополнительное описание: Introduction—Medicine in the Courtroom: Judges, Ethics and the Law Re A (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) [2001] Fam 147 R (on the Application of Axon) v Secretary of State for Health [2006] EWHC 37 (Admin) Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1

Ethical Judgments: Re-Writing Medical Law, Stephen W Smith, John Coggon, Clark Hobson, Richar