Enrichment at the Claimant`s Expense: Attribution Rules in Unjust Enrichment 9781782258391

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 95040.00T
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: 171 шт.
При оформлении заказа до:
Ориентировочная дата поставки:
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Eli Ball
Название: Enrichment at the Claimant`s Expense: Attribution Rules in Unjust Enrichment
ISBN: 9781782258391
Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic
Классификация:

Договорное право

ISBN-10: 1782258396
Обложка/Формат: Hardback
Страницы: 256
Вес: 0.54 кг.
Дата издания: 15.12.2016
Серия: Hart studies in private law
Язык: English
Размер: 165 x 242 x 20
Читательская аудитория: Tertiary education (us: college)
Ключевые слова: Contract law, LAW / Remedies & Damages
Основная тема: Contract law,LAW / Remedies & Damages
Подзаголовок: Attribution rules in unjust enrichment
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: This book presents an account of attribution in unjust enrichment. Attribution refers to how and when two parties – a claimant and a defendant – are relevantly connected to each other for unjust enrichment purposes. It is reflected in the familiar expression that a defendant be ‘enriched at the claimant’s expense’. This book presents a structured account of attribution, consisting of two requirements: first, the identification of an enrichment to the defendant and a loss to the claimant; and, secondly, the identification of a connection between that enrichment and that loss. These two requirements must be kept separate from other considerations often subsumed within the expression ‘enrichment at the claimant’s expense’ which in truth have nothing to do with attribution, and which instead qualify unjust enrichment liability for reasons that should be analysed in their own terms. The structure of attribution so presented fits a normative account of unjust enrichment based upon each party’s exchange capacities. A defendant is enriched when he receives something that he has not paid for under prevailing market conditions, while a claimant suffers a loss when he loses the opportunity to charge for something under the same conditions. A counterfactual test – asking whether enrichment and loss arise ‘but for’ each other – provides the best generalisation for testing whether enrichment and loss are connected, thereby satisfying the requirements of attribution in unjust enrichment.
Дополнительное описание: Part I Defining Enrichment and Loss 1. The Exchange Capacity 2. Enrichment 3. Loss Part II Connecting Enrichment and Loss 4. Connections 5. Generalisations 6. Transactions Part III Qualifying Liability 7. Qualification

Enrichment at the Claimant`s Expense: Attribution Rules in Unjust Enrichment, Eli Ball